Back to Projects

Tender Estimation Agent

AI system that extracts requirements from tender docs, drafts estimates, and produces a clear go/no-go recommendation.

Next.jsNode.jsRAGVector DBOCRClaude API

Key Results

  • Faster tender qualification
  • Less manual copy/paste between docs
  • Consistent estimation format across bids

Tender Estimation Agent

An AI-powered workflow that turns messy tender packs into a structured estimate: requirements → scope → effort → risks → decision.

AI WORKFLOW
Input
AI Agent
Process
Response
Complete
Processing
50+ deployed
60% faster

Context

Tender documents are usually a mix of PDFs, scans, tables, and “please read annex #7” links. Teams lose time on:

  • searching for key requirements,
  • comparing them with internal capabilities,
  • preparing repetitive estimate documents,
  • and making a go/no-go call without missing hidden constraints.

Problem

Manual tender analysis is slow and inconsistent:

  • Critical requirements are easy to miss (deadlines, certifications, penalties).
  • Different people produce different estimate formats.
  • Valuable past learnings don’t carry over to new bids.

Approach

The agent is not “a chat”. It’s a pipeline with guardrails:

  1. Ingest: upload PDFs/Docs/Spreadsheets and normalize into text + tables.
  2. Index: chunk + embed, store in a vector database for retrieval.
  3. Extract: requirements, deliverables, deadlines, constraints, evaluation criteria.
  4. Estimate: draft a scope and effort outline using internal templates.
  5. Risk: generate a risk register with mitigation actions.
  6. Decision: go/no-go recommendation with explicit assumptions.

Implementation notes

  • Retrieval uses “cite-first” prompting: every claim in the summary must reference a source chunk.
  • A strict schema keeps output consistent (sections, checklists, tables).
  • Red flags are elevated: missing pages, inconsistent dates, contradictory requirements.

Output (what the team gets)

  • A one-page summary for stakeholders
  • Requirements table (must-have / nice-to-have / blockers)
  • Estimate draft (milestones + assumptions)
  • Risk register
  • Go/No-Go recommendation with confidence and reasons

Next steps (easy upgrades)

  • Plug in historical bid outcomes to learn “what wins”
  • Add evaluation / regression tests for common tender patterns
  • Auto-generate clarifying questions for the customer

Want to build something similar?